Sponsored Links
-->

Monday, August 13, 2018

Cloud platform comparison: CloudStack, Eucalyptus, vCloud Director ...
src: images.techhive.com

Platform virtualization software, specifically emulators and hypervisors, are software packages that emulate the whole physical computer machine, often providing multiple virtual machines on one physical platform. The table below compares basic information about platform virtualization hypervisors.


Video Comparison of platform virtualization software



General


Maps Comparison of platform virtualization software



Features

  • ^ Providing any virtual environment usually requires some overhead of some type or another. Native usually means that the virtualization technique does not do any CPU level virtualization (like Bochs), which executes code more slowly than when it is directly executed by a CPU. Some other products such as VMWare and Virtual PC use similar approaches to Bochs and QEMU, however they use a number of advanced techniques to shortcut most of the calls directly to the CPU (similar to the process that JIT compiler uses) to bring the speed to near native in most cases. However, some products such as coLinux, Xen, z/VM (in real mode) do not suffer the cost of CPU-level slowdowns as the CPU-level instructions are not proxied or executing against an emulated architecture since the guest OS or hardware is providing the environment for the applications to run under. However access to many of the other resources on the system, such as devices and memory may be proxied or emulated in order to broker those shared services out to all the guests, which may cause some slow downs as compared to running outside of virtualization.
  • ^ OS-level virtualization is described as "native" speed, however some groups have found overhead as high as 3% for some operations, but generally figures come under 1%, so long as secondary effects do not appear.
  • ^ See for a paper comparing performance of paravirtualization approaches (e.g. Xen) with OS-level virtualization
  • ^ Requires patches/recompiling.
  • ^ Exceptional for lightweight, paravirtualized, single-user VM/CMS interactive shell: largest customers run several thousand users on even single prior models. For multiprogramming OSes like Linux on zSeries and z/OS that make heavy use of native supervisor state instructions, performance will vary depending on nature of workload but is near native. Hundreds into the low thousands of Linux guests are possible on a single machine for certain workloads.

Open IaaS Platform Comparison (2nd part) | WalhallaDCS I+D+i
src: tissat.files.wordpress.com


Image type compatibility


Comparison of Best Augmented Reality SDK for AR Development
src: invisible.toys


Other features

  • ^ Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 and Windows 7 SP1 have limited support for redirecting the USB protocol over RDP using RemoteFX.
  • ^ Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 adds accelerated graphics support for certain editions of Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 and Windows 7 SP1 using RemoteFX.

Best Virtual Machine Software.Virtualization Software For Windows ...
src: i.ytimg.com


Restrictions

This table is meant to outline restrictions in the software dictated by licensing or capabilities.

Note: No limit means no enforced limit. For example, a VM with 1 TB of memory cannot fit in a host with only 8 GB memory and no memory swap disk, so it will have a limit of 8 GB physically.


4 Virtual Reality Desktops for Vive, Rift, and Windows VR Compared
src: roadtovrlive-5ea0.kxcdn.com


See also

  • List of computer system emulators
  • Comparison of application virtualization software
  • Popek and Goldberg virtualization requirements
  • Virtual DOS machine
  • x86 virtualization

Best Virtual Team Software Tools
src: 3thlkd3wpu0u1x0qbt19cxc8-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com


Notes


Why did I stop comparing cloud platforms - AWS, Microsoft Azure ...
src: www.anythingcloud.com


References

Source of article : Wikipedia